Door Daan de Wit
De
beste dieven zijn bescheiden. Steeds een klein beetje stelen, valt niet
zo snel op. Ze vallen meestal door de mand als ze te inhalig worden. In
Florida werden ze te inhalig. In vorige delen van onze serie over het
stelen van de verkiezingen door W. Bush hebben we dat al verteld. In dit
deel en in volgende delen komen we met aanwijzingen dat in Amerikaanse
verkiezingen stelselmatig wordt gefaudeerd.
Dit
nieuws ontdekten we dankzij een lezer van DeepJournal die ons een documentaire
toestuurde van de ons bekende journalist Daniël Hopsicker, genaamd The
Big Fix 2000, over de laatste presidentsverkeizingen in de VS. Naar
aanleiding van dit programma trokken we ons waterdichte zwempak aan om
eens even wat te surfen over de woelige baren van het onderwerp stemfraude.
Journalist Lynn Landes was ons al voorgeweest met haar artikel
Elections In America - Assume Crooks Are In Control.
Een
kwestie van vertrouwen
'"The concept is clear, simple, and it works. Computerized
voting gives the power of selection, without fear of discovery, to whomever
controls the computer," wrote the authors of VoteScam
(1992), James & Kenneth Collier (both now deceased). It's a 'must
read' book about how elections have been electronically and mechanically
rigged in the United States for decades, and with the knowing and sometimes
unknowing support of media giants and government officials [...].
Only
a few companies dominate the market for computer voting machines.
Alarmingly, under U.S. federal law, no background checks are required
on these companies or their employees. Felons and foreigners can, and
do, own computer voting machine companies. Voting machine companies demand
that clients sign 'proprietary' contracts to protect their trade secrets,
which prohibits a thorough inspection of voting
machines by outsiders. And, unbelievably, it appears that most
election officials don't require paper ballots to back up or audit electronic
election results. So far, lawsuits to allow complete access to inspect
voting machines, or to require paper ballots so that recounts are possible...have
failed.
As far as we know, some guy from Russia could be controlling the outcome
of computerized elections in the United States.'
Ik
wil niet dat je iets overkomt
'In fact, Vikant Corp., a Chicago-area company owned by
Alex Kantarovick, formerly of Minsk, Belorussia (also known as White Russia,
formerly U.S.S.R.), supplies the all-important 'control cards' to Election
Systems & Software (ES&S), the world's largest election management
company, writes reporter Christopher
Bollyn. According to ES&S, they have "handled more than
40,000 of the world's most important events and elections. ES&S systems
have counted approximately 60% of the U.S. national vote for the past
four presidential elections. In the U.S. 2000 general election, ES&S
systems counted over 100 million ballots." Getting back to Kantarovich,
he would not disclose where the control cards are made, except they aren't
made in America, writes Bollyn. Nor would he discuss his previous employment.
Bollyn says he got some not-too-thinly-veiled threats from Kantarovich.
Kantarovich sounds more like the Russian mafia, than a legitimate businessman.'
In de video van Hopsicker vertelt Bollyn dat hem door Kantarovich te verstaan
werd gegeven dat hij niet wilde dat zijn bedrijf zou worden geschaad of
dat de onderzoeker zou worden geschaad...
Homo
ex machina
'But the really big deal is this....all
of ES&S's touch screen machines contain modems, "allowing them
to communicate—and be communicated with—while they are in operation,"
reports Bollyn. That communication capability includes satellites. "Even
computers not connected to modems or an electronic network can still be
manipulated offsite, not during the election, but certainly before or
after," says voting systems expert Dr. Rebecca Mercuri.
ES&S
supplied the touch screens for Miami-Dade and Broward counties where the
worst machine failures occurred. But the debacle was nothing new for ES&S.
Associated Press (AP) reporter Jessica Fargen wrote in June 2000, "Venezuela's
president and the head of the nation's election board accused ES&S
of trying to destabilize the country's electoral process. In the United
States, four states have reported problems with equipment supplied by
the company. Faulty ES&S machines used in Hawaii's 1998 elections
forced that state's first-ever recount."'
Over
de beruchte hertelling in 2000 staat een eigenaardig citaat in dit interview
met de 82-jarige uitvinder van de stemmachine, William Rouverol. '``I
can see why there's a pretty good reason why the Republicans are so concerned
about the hand recount,'' he said. ``It sounds to me that the glitch is
in the programming, not the butterfly ballot. Whether
it's purposeful or accidental, I'm not prepared to say.'' [...]
Rouverol said the machine's basic design has changed little since its
introduction nearly 40 years ago. The standards for manufacturing the
ballots also date from the 1960s.' Hij is dus niet
bereid te zeggen of er een opzettelijke programmeerfout zit in de machines
waardoor de Republikeinen ongerust zijn voor een handmatige hertelling...