|
|
19 December 2006 |
mail this article
|
print
|
This article is part of the series: What goes on[ 1 - 2 - 3 ]
What goes on - 3
Read the three parts of this article on one page.
-
By Daan de Wit
This is what might be going on On different levels things are moving in opposite ways, creating a movement that can be represented in a simple diagram with two lines: one going up and one going down, creating an x-like figure. But the descriptions explaining the lines are not as simple. For instance, the invasion of our privacy goes up, but then also does criticism about it. And at the same time the quality of the measures that are eroding our privacy is going down due to the failures of the techniques used, the impracticality of the massive amounts of data gathered as well as the misuse of new laws, such as when police demand to see identification - this does not catch terrorists, but is instead used to expand power and drive up fines. The number of dead and wounded in the expedition in Iraq makes the pain and sorrow index go up, adding to the record violence that our world has seen the last one hundred years. But another trend is going against the grain, picking up momentum, so much so that harsh criticism has come from the inner circle of the ones who initiated this violence based on deception. This is a bitter victory for the millions who opposed this war in the first place, but who were not heard by their representatives. Part of the opposing trend is the fact that, aside from views and ideologies, the Iraq war for example does not seem to be working, unless you are of the school who regards the insurgency as part of the strategy of devide and conquer. These two trends are becoming more and more visible. The point at which the two lines representing these trends collide is crucial. These collisions happen all the time, but the impact is getting bigger because of the media attention and the growing importance of the actors. It makes a difference if the media is a xeroxed pamphlet or a nationally broadcasted documentary. It makes a difference if the actor is an activist on a soap box or James Baker III scolding the Bush policy. The greater impact of the collisions shows that on many levels things are getting pushed to the extreme, but that at the same time it's the pushing of these extremes that is causing things to fall apart and get noticed. It becomes more apparent what Antony Sutton - the researcher/author who first published on Skull & Bones - said to me: 'It is not about left and right, it is about us and them'. It will be a matter of time before this is understood on a worldwide scale. The question is whether or not the extremes will have pushed us over the edge by then, or if there will still be anything left to take back of what we gave away all the time.
The strongest man in the circus notices he is not standing on his legs so firmly anymore. The crowd starts to mumble; it is beginning to doubt if the weights the man is lifting, are as real as they appear. You have to shift focus and squint with your eyes to see it, but things are moving. Patterns that have been in place for what appears to be forever, seem to start shifting. The upper part of the pyramid shows cracks while at the same time the giant awakes, starts to slowly open up his eyes: more and more people wake up to see that their best interest is not served by the very small group of people governing them. What if it is true, that the dollar is not based on a golden foundation, but on thin air? Why do we pour money into wars based on deception, while we are short on money for schooling and for bridging the widening gap between rich and poor? 'Kyoto' fails because of a man who stole the presidency from a man who shows us that our environment, thus a part of ourselves and our future selves, is sacrified by many for profit for a few. It is 'An inconvenient truth', but it is starting to sink in, opening eyes. It is only the beginning. This reads like good news, and in a sense it is, but the old guard won't just pack up and leave, it still believes the illusion it created.
The top of the pyramid has a power base made out of thin air: visions of scarcity, feelings of fear, thoughts of limits, words of deception. It is all blown away with ease in a gentle, yet firm way, by a giant, if it wants to. There is an impression of decline from the top down, causing an unease that could have unpredictable or extreme effects, caused by people who seem to be living a paradigm of an alchemist creating life from death, peace through violence; 'Iran' is not off the table: 1, 2. At the same time from the bottom up there is an accelerating realization that it is time to wake up from this bad dream and leave behind that fuzzy, intoxicated feeling. What are the facts, what is the situation, what are the possibilities?
____________________________________________________________________________
DeepJournal
Sign up for the free mailing list.
|
|
|
12 September 2013 |
Why is Syria under attack? - Part 4
When you peek below the surface, it becomes clear that Syria is under attack due to the interests of the parties involved. ‘Syria’ is about power, money, influence and energy.
10 September 2013 |
Why is Syria under attack? - 3
8 September 2013 |
Why is Syria under attack? - Part 2
In the event of major military conflicts that risk considerable humanitarian and economic consequences, it is useful to examine the interests of all parties involved as well as the role that the media plays in reporting the events.
7 September 2013 |
Why is Syria under attack? - Part 1
On the surface it’s straightforward: the U.S. wants to liberate Syria from a brutal dictator who is attacking his own people with poison gas. But beneath the surface there is something very different going on.
28 August 2012
Daan de Wit (DeepJournal) interviewt Webster Tarpley op het Magneetfestival
Het Magneetfestival gaat de diepte in met vier interviews. Daan de Wit interviewt Webster Tarpley, Albert Spits, en Mike Donkers.
|
|
|
|
|